5-4-14
Thanks to Linda Sheppard for helping out with some images.
I'm going through this art thing at the moment, in terms of what is currently valid and what is not.
And does it matter two figs.
I always felt that (starting) in the late 60's creativity had a mind of it's own:
Happenings , Light-shows and generally the feeling that everyone was involved.(Nowadays performance art, installations)
Music (We seem at present to be reverting to the "do it yourself" freedom from the major record companies.) Santana offers himself as a shaman, rather than rock star.
Posters, actual pieces of work, that were affordable and very real - in your hand as it were.
All Kinds of paint application, (followed by Jean-Michel Basquiat, 1985 show with Andy Warhol. Collaboration works. If it doesn't move - paint on it.)
A lot of this stuff gets regurgitated and ownership gets re-claimed.
-a bit like Christians putting a church on top of a pagan mound.
Pics by Linda Sheppard
Anyway, the general feeling I get is that psychedelia is a thing of the past and it's a bit uncool to be involved with it.
The trouble is that this is a very valid, vibrant and dangerous form of expression. (ask Jung)
It is a form of art work with a very definite motive:
Stop the world and blow your mind!
How close it is to surreal , I do not know,
but it is very definitely a means to help you on your way,
on your way to possibly a better understanding of yourself.
*
*
*
*
*
*
SURREAL IS COOL (REALLY)
Does the idea precede the mark?
I mean, the focus on this
If you think too hard about what you are
about to do
Everything pauses
and sometimes, everything goes (this is normal isn't it?)
Where is the line?
Between being weird
or living a weird edge
*
Relatively recent paintings for a backdrop. I started from the middle, initially as a linear affair. Actually pretending it was a map to get lost in. Then added colour when I realised that it could quite comfortably take it.
*
*
*
*
*
On the surreal angle:
I wrote this the day after Osama Bin Laden was shot:
In a lot of senses - I suppose that I have been following a " surrealist" path throughout my entire art life, since I was fifteen years old. Loads of it is brain to hand - immediate stuff before anything else gets in the way - any other thought that is.
But the subject matter is also directly about "unlocking" what was being thought, as oppose the what the thought process was about.
Hard fact is; I can!
I am wealthy enough to exist and be able to carry on producing art that is only relevant to my being and way of life. I can't fault it but do complain sometimes.
BUT, surreal is such a taboo. Is this mainly because of Dali?
Mind, Miro made another existence whereas Dali just explained it.
 |
| The Weird in the Temple |
 |
Two temple pictures from Tamil Nadu Painted in 2018, But originating in 1993 |
From the temple complex in Madurai, South India. I described it as a cosmic rugby pitch.
Thinking about the enormity of the images and the way the characters intertwine all at once introduced me to the term eidetic. A bit like "cop a load of this!"
Loads of L.P. sleeves were adorned with that kind of stuff in the late sixties - first one that springs to mind is the Stones, Satanic Majesties.
*
*
*
*
*
No comments:
Post a Comment